The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) said on Thursday that it will reconsider air quality standards for soot that the Trump administration declined to tighten.
A statement from the agency said that it would take a second look at the standards for the pollution, also known as particulate matter, because “available scientific evidence and technical information indicate that the current standards may not be adequate to protect public health and welfare.”
The EPA said that it anticipates proposing a new rule next summer and promulgating a final rule in spring 2023.
ADVERTISEMENT
“The most vulnerable among us are most at risk from exposure to particulate matter, and that’s why it’s so important we take a hard look at these standards that haven’t been updated in nine years,” Administrator Michael Regan
Michael ReganEPA to revise Trump rollback to water pollution protections EPA chief emphasizes staffing, environmental justice in Appropriations testimony OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Biden ends infrastructure talks with key Republican | Colonial Pipeline CEO grilled over ransomware attack | Texas gov signs bills to improve power grid after winter storm MORE said in a statement.
Exposure to a smaller form of particulate matter called fine particulate matter has been linked to health risks including heart attacks, asthma attacks, and premature death.
The EPA in December finalized a decision to retain standards set by the Obama administration in 2012 for both fine and coarse forms of particulate matter.
Administrator Andrew Wheeler
Andrew WheelerEPA to revise Trump rule limiting state authority to block pipelines EPA rescinds Trump rule expected to make air pollution regulation harder EPA rescinds Trump rule allowing public to weigh in on agency guidance MORE at the time defended the standard as “protective of public health.”
But, a policy assessment from agency staff last year found that long-term exposure to the current maximum standard for fine particulate matter could result in thousands more people being put at risk than if the standard were tightened.
It said that scientific evidence and air quality analyses “can reasonably be viewed as calling into question the adequacy of the public health protection afforded by the combination of the current … standards” for fine particulate matter.
“A conclusion that the current … standards do provide adequate public health protection would place little weight on the broad body of epidemiologic evidence reporting generally positive and statistically significant health effect associations,” it continued.
