The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Friday finalized a rule to control leaks of a type of pollution from industrial equipment, though critics argued the agency did not go far enough.
The agency announced Monday that it had promulgated a rule to regulate emissions of ethylene oxide (EtO), which is used in the production of industrial chemicals. Chronic exposure to EtO has been associated with cancer and neurotoxicity and short-term exposure has been linked to lung injuries.
EPA administrator Andrew Wheeler
Andrew WheelerOVERNIGHT ENERGY: States, green groups sue Trump over rollback of Obama fuel efficiency regulations | Oil lobby says low prices still hurting industry | Conservative group wants Trump to go further in rolling back key environmental law States, green groups sue Trump over rollback of Obama fuel efficiency regulations OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Coal company sues EPA over power plant pollution regulation | Automakers fight effort to freeze fuel efficiency standards | EPA watchdog may probe agency’s response to California water issues MORE said in a statement that the action underscores the Trump Administration’s “commitment to addressing and reducing hazardous air pollutants, including ethylene oxide emissions, across the country.”
But Emma Cheuse, an attorney with Earthjustce, criticized the agency for choosing to finalize what she called the “less-protective” option of two that it was considering.
“EPA has chosen not to control the pollution as much as possible to prevent people from getting cancer from ethylene oxide,” Cheuse told The Hill.
The proposed rule set a less stringent standard for how much ethylene oxide emissions would be considered leaks that needed to be fixed at certain high-risk facilities.
Cheuse said she believed the rule should have included other measures such as fence-line monitoring, in which facilities track emissions at the edge of their facilities to determine how much of the substance is crossing into other areas.
While the rule was at the White House under final consideration, the administration held two meetings, one the day before the rule was finalized, with representatives from the chemical and medical industries. It did not hold meetings with environmentalists during this time, though it did meet with some environmental groups when the rule was in an earlier stage.
The agency’s rule follows a 2017 court order requiring it to, within three years, determine whether it needed additional regulations for several industrial processes.
